luigi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:07 pm
Generalrabogolfo wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 2:05 pm
luigi wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 12:51 pm
I'm seeing a lot of references to PQ being plot relevant to Homestuck2 now. Do I actually have to play that trash to understand what's going on now? Like I know I can just get the spoilers online without playing it but even if the game is bad that seems like a bad way of receiving story information, I'd still prefer to see it myself.
So that said do I have to go through PESTERQUEST? I couldn't even make it through the first couple chapters of Friendsim. And will I need Friendsim to understand Pesterquest too? From what I've gathered MSPAR's journey so far is like other mspaintadventures -> Homestuck -> Friendsim -> Pesterquest -> Homestuck^2? Is this right?
This is on topic to this thread bc I'm only asking because of its relation to HS^2 and whether or not I should play it to continue better understanding HS^2.
Nvm friendsim is actually pretty funny while drunk.
who the fuck said pesterquest is in anyway relevant to h^2? its not. wtf
That's what I've been gathering from this thread. There are people saying omg this isn't candy have you seen PQ the Reader must have changed something!!!
And stuff to that effect. The impression I've gathered is that something happens at the end of PQ that explains HS^2's writing mistakes as not being actual mistakes but all intentional.
The amount of odd inconsistencies to Candy, and candy alone, makes it feel as if something has changed. This is homestuck and the writers are competent enough to look into things, not ot mention hussie advises things too, so it seems like these are deliberate. Litreally linking the epilogue chapter referenced, which shows the messed up timeline.
If not it is an extremely unusual occurrence. Not even incompetence, they ahve proven they are competent, but like they suddenly all took drugs.
Though now that i think about it there were inconsistencies going on in Candy already. People remembering things wrong. Rose, roxie, callie and others not remembering their whole canon discussion. I don't remember if anyone had odd memories though.....
Its just all around weird and seems inconsistent with how they have written things before.... With pesterquest they had some inconsistencies but they were visual in nature and was more the artists making a mistake or two. Though i imagine some of them were intentional considering other routes. The epilogues were consistent largely so why isn't candy right now?
Is it incompetence? Is it deliberate? It has sign of deliberate but are they actually all on drugs?